eCOA DATA DEEMED QUANTITATIVELY SUPERIOR TO PAPER-BASED STUDY ARM

Merck carried out a formal clinical trial to identify and evaluate differences in data quality and in the activities required of sponsor and site staff when using ePRO methods vs. paper methods for data capture.

Read this case study to learn how:

  • ePRO data were quantitatively superior in 5 categories
  • Data variance for Total Sleep Time (TST) was significantly lower with electronic capture
  • ePRO achieved 41% lower standard deviation from the norm

CaseStudy_SE_eCOA_MerckCaseStudy_20180511